[ ...well, if this isn't the most random message she's received since she's been here. Natasha debates only briefly how to answer before she sends back an unencrypted text. ]
I haven't worked as an assassin in decades. But I don't think that's the sort of thing you ever stop being. What you've done and the skills you've learned are always a part of you, so I suppose the answer is yes. Why do you ask?
Nothing bad, I hope. I was speaking to someone I strongly believe is another associate of yours. He also knew Tony and Thor, so process of elimination; if you know a Steve, then don't worry there isn't a spy or something. He mentioned the master assassin part, but not explicitly who.
Two, actually. I thought maybe you'd be one of them.
What I used to do is public knowledge in my world. And I did do quite a few things that were bad. [ And it's so painfully, horrifically telling that this kid can think 'assassin' and be like 'well, okay, as long as it was part of the government'. Gah, it makes her furious at what's been done to him. ] It's irritating to have who you used to be be the first association anyone has with you, so it's not something I've made public here, but it is not a secret.
Bad might be subjective, but there are also things that are objectively wrong, no matter the reason.
It's not upsetting, I'm just providing context. Most people find the idea of talking with a master assassin unsettling. Since I'm no longer active in that capacity, I like to spare myself the burden of convincing others I'm not about to kill them for more Lore.
[...Sephiroth's pretty sure that's not actually true, but he can't think of any examples offhand.]
It doesn't bother me any, then. Assassin, soldier, bartender, bureaucrat, fireman, they're jobs. Doesn't everyone say what you do isn't supposed to define you?
But on that note can you really kill someone for lore.
That's an oversimplification. Of course what we do helps to define us; we spend a large portion of our life doing it, after all. That isn't to say it's the only part of the definition, but to leave it out would certainly be incomplete.
And yes. But an honest assassin would have to give it back the next day. Waste of everyone's time.
Going for thoroughly complete would be difficult. Even if it's not ideal and leaves a lot out, I think I'm best off with the oversimplification. Categorizing people just based on their profession seems like it might go badly.
[Would he want to be judged on all the killing he does? Nope.
Sephiroth does have a sense of humor, it's just terribly dry. Did he catch hers? It's hard to tell!]
Explaining to your target you just needed a bit more lore to replace a pair of boots with sounds like it'd be a terribly awkward conversation, best to avoid that too.
Not that I was planning on killing anyone for a pair of boots.
Can I ask for some practical advice, given your previous career? It's fine if not, it's not a pressing issue at all.
[ And that is exactly why she is not going to let this go. ]
Oversimplification leads to inefficacy. Categories are only containers for information; people are complex. What we do becomes a part of who we are, and it would be dangerous to ignore that.
You can ask. Although I think you should tell me your name at this point before it becomes too awkward to ask. I'm Natasha.
What they do. Not their profession, what they actually do, every day. What someone's like outs itself in every interaction. The cruelest, most vicious person can still be a doctor, after all.
[He's pretty sure every doctor is the same, some just hide it better. It's a deliberate choice not to write it; her world might be different after all.]
I want to be clear, I am in no way in danger or anticipating that changing, this is not a live scenario.
But if I were contending with an assassin, what would be the best way to not get horribly dead? My education tended to be more open conflict.
The best way not to get horribly dead by a competent assassin is to convince them to not try to kill you. Assassination is nothing like open combat. There are hundreds of ways to eliminate someone subtly, drastically, or from a distance, and the methods depend on the practitioner and occasionally the kill order.
The second best way is to convince the person who paid the assassin to rescind the kill order, or eliminate the assassin's motivation for killing you.
The third best way is to remember to look up when clearing a room. Most people forget to do that.
What do you know about the preferred methods of the assassin who is in no way currently putting you in danger?
[ You absolute CHILD, you brainwashed MENACE, what the HELL is this? ]
[It's purely a hypothetical, surely. Except this is all getting written down for later.]
Sometimes I wonder if this is why we're never allowed cross-training with other departments, then we don't know what to do with them if we face them.
I suppose finding ways to convince them to go away would also vary wildly depending on the assassin in question? It's probably not a good idea to meet up with your target for a friendly chat over dinner so they can plead their case. I know what I'd do if it were my assignment.
But I was being truthful, I'm not currently in any danger at all! Sometimes people assume otherwise, so I thought I'd try to clear that away immediately. Did I do it wrong?
The scenario, live or not, engenders concern by its very nature. Most people don’t bother to try and take precautions against an assassination unless they’re concerned it’s going to become an issue. You didn’t do it wrong. There was simply a very slim chance of success, and that depended on the person you were asking, not on how well you said not to worry about it.
[ So yeah. Ask a sociopath and you probably would have been fine. Sociopaths are very limited tools; the Red Room avoided cultivating them. They wanted someone who’d be able to feel and do it anyway. At least, that’s what they’d wanted for her class before she dropped a building on their heads. ]
This person is from your world? Do you know if the vendetta is personal or professional?
Most people don't take precautions against most things, I've found. I admit I never really thought about being attacked before, they were always a complimentary skill set to our own.
[SOLDIER too had no use for sociopaths. They couldn't pass the rigorous tests needed to be certain the process wouldn't turn them into literal bloodthirsty monsters.
Doing a terrible job of raising the children in their care, that's completely different.]
This one in particular is, yes. I believe it would be professional; I would at this point qualify as a lost asset, which would if it became an issue, make me a high priority target for retrieval or removal.
[ …how long has this kid been active? He can’t be much more than sixteen. Yelena had been active while still a child, but assassination and combat training were very different asks. Most child soldiers were given some training, but considered disposable by the bastards who ‘recruited’ them. This kid said he’d been in charge of his whole unit? What kind of a messed up… ]
Is that your opinion or was that relayed to you by your potential assassin? Because only a moron attempts to retrieve someone when there is no way to actually bring them anywhere else. If he’s stupid, your life is about to get a lot easier.
[ She does not actually think the assassin is stupid, but she wants Sephiroth to have to look at the actual evidence. ]
If anyone could figure out how to violate the barriers between realities, it would be Shinra's scientists. We only believe Folkmore is inviolate because its capricious creator says it is.
I don't really consider that to be foolproof evidence.
I don't know how things are done on your world, but if you're attempting to imply that if he's not a scientist it can't be possible, I regret to inform you our scientists don't use themselves for those kinds of experiments. They find disposable people in case something goes wrong, like SOLDIER. Or Turks.
5/19/2024; UN: USERNAME0175 probably not an Avengers Group Chat. probably
Are you a master assassin? If it's secret you don't need to tell me.
un: romanoff | text probably not, yes
I haven't worked as an assassin in decades. But I don't think that's the sort of thing you ever stop being. What you've done and the skills you've learned are always a part of you, so I suppose the answer is yes. Why do you ask?
[ Honestly, what the HECK is this? ]
no subject
Two, actually. I thought maybe you'd be one of them.
no subject
What I used to do is public knowledge in my world. And I did do quite a few things that were bad. [ And it's so painfully, horrifically telling that this kid can think 'assassin' and be like 'well, okay, as long as it was part of the government'. Gah, it makes her furious at what's been done to him. ] It's irritating to have who you used to be be the first association anyone has with you, so it's not something I've made public here, but it is not a secret.
no subject
no subject
It's not upsetting, I'm just providing context. Most people find the idea of talking with a master assassin unsettling. Since I'm no longer active in that capacity, I like to spare myself the burden of convincing others I'm not about to kill them for more Lore.
no subject
It doesn't bother me any, then. Assassin, soldier, bartender, bureaucrat, fireman, they're jobs. Doesn't everyone say what you do isn't supposed to define you?
But on that note can you really kill someone for lore.
no subject
And yes. But an honest assassin would have to give it back the next day. Waste of everyone's time.
[ She thinks she's funny, anyway. ]
no subject
[Would he want to be judged on all the killing he does? Nope.
Sephiroth does have a sense of humor, it's just terribly dry. Did he catch hers? It's hard to tell!]
Explaining to your target you just needed a bit more lore to replace a pair of boots with sounds like it'd be a terribly awkward conversation, best to avoid that too.
Not that I was planning on killing anyone for a pair of boots.
Can I ask for some practical advice, given your previous career? It's fine if not, it's not a pressing issue at all.
no subject
Oversimplification leads to inefficacy. Categories are only containers for information; people are complex. What we do becomes a part of who we are, and it would be dangerous to ignore that.
You can ask. Although I think you should tell me your name at this point before it becomes too awkward to ask. I'm Natasha.
no subject
I don't know how I keep forgetting that. This isn't even the third time. I'm Sephiroth.
I don't mean to suggest it should be disregarded entirely, just that it shouldn't carry the most weight in deciding what someone's like.
no subject
What do you think should carry the most weight in deciding what someone's like, then?
no subject
no subject
[ Even the ones that are done under the guise of a job. ]
What did you want to ask me?
no subject
I want to be clear, I am in no way in danger or anticipating that changing, this is not a live scenario.
But if I were contending with an assassin, what would be the best way to not get horribly dead? My education tended to be more open conflict.
1/2
no subject
The second best way is to convince the person who paid the assassin to rescind the kill order, or eliminate the assassin's motivation for killing you.
The third best way is to remember to look up when clearing a room. Most people forget to do that.
What do you know about the preferred methods of the assassin who is in no way currently putting you in danger?
[ You absolute CHILD, you brainwashed MENACE, what the HELL is this? ]
no subject
Sometimes I wonder if this is why we're never allowed cross-training with other departments, then we don't know what to do with them if we face them.
I suppose finding ways to convince them to go away would also vary wildly depending on the assassin in question? It's probably not a good idea to meet up with your target for a friendly chat over dinner so they can plead their case. I know what I'd do if it were my assignment.
But I was being truthful, I'm not currently in any danger at all! Sometimes people assume otherwise, so I thought I'd try to clear that away immediately. Did I do it wrong?
no subject
[ So yeah. Ask a sociopath and you probably would have been fine. Sociopaths are very limited tools; the Red Room avoided cultivating them. They wanted someone who’d be able to feel and do it anyway. At least, that’s what they’d wanted for her class before she dropped a building on their heads. ]
This person is from your world? Do you know if the vendetta is personal or professional?
no subject
[SOLDIER too had no use for sociopaths. They couldn't pass the rigorous tests needed to be certain the process wouldn't turn them into literal bloodthirsty monsters.
Doing a terrible job of raising the children in their care, that's completely different.]
This one in particular is, yes. I believe it would be professional; I would at this point qualify as a lost asset, which would if it became an issue, make me a high priority target for retrieval or removal.
no subject
Is that your opinion or was that relayed to you by your potential assassin? Because only a moron attempts to retrieve someone when there is no way to actually bring them anywhere else. If he’s stupid, your life is about to get a lot easier.
[ She does not actually think the assassin is stupid, but she wants Sephiroth to have to look at the actual evidence. ]
no subject
I don't really consider that to be foolproof evidence.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Unless you think your scientists back home already know of the existence of Folkmore, there’s not a lot they can do.
What’s a Turk?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
propaganda!!
(no subject)
(no subject)
1/2
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
1/2 (I think you are the sole recipient of all of her multitags so far)
(no subject)
he keeps leaving out the important bits
lol, like names XDD
whoops~
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)